Fathom vs tl;dv

AI meeting assistants

The practical difference

Fathom: Customer-facing teams that need structured follow-up after calls.

tl;dv: Sales and customer teams comparing insights across many calls.

At a glance

What to compareFathomtl;dv
At a glanceA meeting assistant focused on recordings, summaries, action items and CRM workflows.A multilingual meeting recorder with summaries, clips and conversation intelligence.
Good fit forCustomer-facing teams that need structured follow-up after calls.Sales and customer teams comparing insights across many calls.
Strengths
  • Meeting recordings, summaries, action items and CRM workflows.
  • Meeting recordings, clips and conversation insights.
Things to consider
  • Advanced CRM and team management features depend on the plan.
  • Current paid-plan allowances need an additional source check.
Plan structureFree individual access; paid individual and team plans. Advanced CRM and management features depend on the plan.Free entry verified; exact paid plans need an additional check.
Models and independent evidence

An exact model version has not been confirmed in the available sources. The benchmark pages below provide technical context. Source

Anthropic Source

User reviews

Choose by your workflow

Consider Fathom

A meeting assistant focused on recordings, summaries, action items and CRM workflows.

Customer-facing teams that need structured follow-up after calls.

Things to consider

  • Advanced CRM and team management features depend on the plan.
  • Meeting recording, summary and CRM features should be compared separately from speech-model benchmarks.
Explore tool

Consider tl;dv

A multilingual meeting recorder with summaries, clips and conversation intelligence.

Sales and customer teams comparing insights across many calls.

Things to consider

  • Current paid-plan allowances need an additional source check.
  • An Anthropic partnership does not identify the transcription engine or exact summary model.
Explore tool

Pricing and plans

Fathom

Free individual access; paid individual and team plans. Advanced CRM and management features depend on the plan.

Plan structures reflect the documented source date. Check current prices and limits with the provider.

Source checked: Oct 3, 2026

Visit official site

tl;dv

Free entry verified; exact paid plans need an additional check.

Plan structures reflect the documented source date. Check current prices and limits with the provider.

Source checked: Oct 3, 2026

Visit official site

Models and independent evidence

A model benchmark describes the tested model and task. It does not measure the whole tool, its interface, or every available plan.

Hugging Face & contributors

Open ASR Leaderboard

Hugging Face & contributors · Speech-recognition models only. What it measures: Transcription accuracy and speed. Plots word error rate against speed across ASR models. It does not measure meeting summaries, action items or integrations.

Scope
Speech-recognition models only
What it measures
Transcription accuracy and speed

Sources and evidence

Before you choose

Check whether the features described here are included in the plan you intend to use. A strong model does not replace a workflow that fits your task.

Related comparisons